Multiple versions of alternative text for rule 17A | Quill

Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:

Look for the pages that have the shortcut code symbol Quill - Jump To Icon (e4242)

Jump To

e4242
You can click this icon to copy the jump to url to that page to your clipboard, ready to paste into emails, notes, documents or research papers as needed.

This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.

Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.

Retrieving full text, please wait

These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.

Collection associations (0)

None

None

This document contains 7 versions of alternative text, presumably for paragraph 17A of the composite procedural rules text, which stated that the outcome of the talks process would be agreed by the mechanisms described in specific paragraphs (marked by x's, presumably to be filled later), and that there was no other limitation on the agreement that would be reached. The papers also provide Ken Maginnis's version of the text.

CJ 4/12260

ground rules and procedural challenges in the talks

Jump To

i30367

CJ 4/12260

59 1996 - 1996

Search items

No Associations

Related People

N/A

Related Organisations

Office of the Chairmen; UUP; DUP
British Government

Unless otherwise specified, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitzed by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.

No Transcription