Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.
Collection associations (0)
None
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
FROM: PUS 17 JANUARY 1991
Copy no ..... of [4] cc. Mr Pilling [2] Mr Deverell [3]
SECRETARY OF STATE [1]
PROVISIONALS: THE CONTACT ISSUE
Following our discussion yesterday afternoon, I attach, in case of need:
(i) an unclassified list of possible questions and answers for use at Question Time; and
(ii) a note, also classified Secret and Personal, for use if Mr John Hume asks for your reaction to what he said to Mr McNeill and me on Friday last (11 January).
I cannot pretend that this advice is entirely satisfactory, but it rests on the assumption that anything said in Parliament or in public should be framed so as to preserve maximum freedom of manoevre to the extent that is consistent with previous statements of Government policy (including your 'British Presence' speech, and what the Prime Minister said to Mr Trimble in the House of Commons on Tuesday 15 January - extracts are attached) and the need to reassure and sustain trust on the Unionist side. I also assume a blocking or evasive line would simply create suspicion.
While a supplementary on this point could come up on almost any Question, the likeliest are nos 1 (Mr Andrew Mitchell), 5 (Mr Ron Brown) and perhaps 12 (Mr Andrew Hunter). No. 20 (Mr Michael Latham) is most unlikely to be reached, I imagine. You may want to consider whether the Minister of State and Mr Hanley should have a copy of the note (though they would be able to say the point does not arise on any of their questions).
Signed:
J A CHILCOT
17 JANUARY 1991
JEN/L/1/26/21224
27 1988 - 2023
38 1993 - 1993
55 101 - 1991
64 1993 - 2020
26 1993 - 1993
57 1993 - 1993
59 1993 - 1993
51 1993 - 1993
18 1993 - 1993
24 1993 - 1994
41 1993 - 1994
32 1993 - 1994
72 101 - 1994
8 101 - 1990
76 101 - 1994
1 1994
60 101 - 1994
65 1993 - 2023
37 101 - 1993
54 101 - 1993
32 101 - 1993
77 1993 - 1993
58 101 - 2018
49 1993 - 1997
61 101 - 1992
38 101 - 1991
48 1992 - 1993
134 101 - ?-??
59 101 - 2023
84 101 - 1993
64 101 - 1991
44
11
31 1996 - 1996
61 1996 - 1996
49 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1997
32 1996 - 1996
48 1996 - 1996
74 1996 - None
4 1996 - 1996
33 1996 - 1996
30 1996 - 1996
7 1996 - 1996
24 1996 - 1996
9 1996 - 1996
59 1996 - 1996
60 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1997
41 1996 - 1996
45 1996 - 1996
67 1996 - 1996
16 1996 - 1996
87 1996 - None
23 1996 - 1996
79 1996 - None
22 1996 - 1996
1991-01-17
This memo encloses two documents: one with responses for potential questions in preparation for Question Hour and another with the suggested line for Peter Brooke to take in his meeting with John Hume. It notes that the briefings were prepared with the aim of allowing Peter Brooke to retain maximum room for manoeuvre while staying consistent with past statements issued by the British Government.
No Associations
N/A
N/A
Unless otherwise specified, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitzed by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.