Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.
Collection associations (0)
None
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
PAB/6760/DGMcN/RG
FROM: D G McNEILL, PAB
DATE: 4 JANUARY 1991
[Copy NO ___ of [12]
PS/PUS (B&L) [3&4]
Mr Pilling [5]
Mr Ledlie [6]
Mr Alston [7]
Mr Deverell [8]
Mr Thomas [9]
Mr Petch [10]
Mr Marsh [11]
File [12]
PS/Secretary of State (B&L) [1&2]
POLITICAL MOVEMENT AND THE PROVISIONALS
1. I attach a copy of a press article - copied separately by telecopier - written by Anthony Coughlan, University of Dublin, which he sent to John Hume who gave it to me and asked that I draw it to the attention of the Secretary of State for background briefing.
2. I do not know Anthony Coughlan but John Hume says he is something of a "guru" to Republicans and he was asked by Sinn Fein to analyse the Secretary of State's "British Presence" speech for this. This article emerged from some of those considerations. You will note in his covering letter to John Hume that Coughlan declares that the "British Presence" speech "attracted considerable attention in Republican circles".
3. If the author is close to Sinn Fein thinking that the article does show some evidence of developing thought within Republican circles. Firstly it acknowledges that there is a general consensus that there can be no change in the North's constitutional status within the UK except with the consent of the majority there, (I read "there" as Northern Ireland). However it defines this consent in two ways - consent to the principle of unity and consent to the means of unity including consent to financial, constitutional and political means in a united Ireland. This article states that Unionists should have no unilateral right to union as a principle and suggests in effect that the Irish Government should say to the British Government - lets both aim for long term unity and work over however long a necessary timespan to secure majority consent in Northern Ireland to unity. In those circumstances the question is posed "would there be any point ...... in the IRA continuing its military campaign".
(SIGNED)
D G McNEILL
Political Affairs Division
SH Ext 2238
PAB/6760/DGMcN/RG
FROM: D G McNEILL, PAB DATE: 4 JANUARY 1991
[Copy NO ___ of [12] PS/PUS (B&L) [3&4] Mr Pilling [5] Mr Ledlie [6] Mr Alston [7] Mr Deverell [8] Mr Thomas [9] Mr Petch [10] Mr Marsh [11] File [12]
PS/Secretary of State (B&L) [1&2]
POLITICAL MOVEMENT AND THE PROVISIONALS
I attach a copy of a press article - copied separately by telecopier - written by Anthony Coughlan, University of Dublin, which he sent to John Hume who gave it to me and asked that I draw it to the attention of the Secretary of State for background briefing.
I do not know Anthony Coughlan but John Hume says he is something of a "guru" to Republicans and he was asked by Sinn Fein to analyse the Secretary of State's "British Presence" speech for this. This article emerged from some of those considerations. You will note in his covering letter to John Hume that Coughlan declares that the "British Presence" speech "attracted considerable attention in Republican circles".
If the author is close to Sinn Fein thinking that the article does show some evidence of developing thought within Republican circles. Firstly it acknowledges that there is a general consensus that there can be no change in the North's constitutional status within the UK except with the consent of the majority there, (I read "there" as Northern Ireland). However it defines this consent in two ways - consent to the principle of unity and consent to the means of unity including consent to financial, constitutional and political means in a united Ireland. This article states that Unionists should have no unilateral right to union as a principle and suggests in effect that the Irish Government should say to the British Government - lets both aim for long term unity and work over however long a necessary timespan to secure majority consent in Northern Ireland to unity. In those circumstances the question is posed "would there be any point ...... in the IRA continuing its military campaign".
(SIGNED)
D G McNEILL Political Affairs Division SH Ext 2238
27 1987 - 1990
38 1993
55 1990 - 1991
64 1993 - 1997
26 1993
57 1993
59 1993
51 1993
18 1993
24 1993 - 1994
41 1993 - 1994
32 1993 - 1994
72 1993 - 1994
8 1989 - 1990
76 1993 - 1994
1 1994
60 1993
65 1993
37 1993
54 1993
32 1993
77 1993
59 1993
49 1993
61 1991 - 1992
38 1991
48 1992 - 1993
134 1993 - ?-??
59 1993 - 1993
84 1993
64 1991
42
9
31 1996 - 1996
61 196 - 1996
49 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1997
32 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1996
74 1996 - None
4 1996 - 1996
8 1996 - 1996
30 1996 - 1996
7 1996 - 1996
24 1996 - 1996
9 1996 - 1996
59 1996 - 1996
60 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1997
41 1996 - 1996
45 1996 - 1996
67 1996 - 1996
16 1996 - 1996
1991-01-04
This memo comments on a recent press article written by Anthony Coughlan on Peter Brooke's Whitbread speech from 9 November 1990. It notes that the document encloses a copy of the article; however, the copy is not present in the box.
No Associations
N/A
N/A
Unless otherwise specified, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitzed by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.