Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.
Collection associations (2)
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
10 DOWNING STREET
LONDON SW1A 2AA
From the Private Secretary
30 November 1993
Dear Jonathan,
TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH ARCHBISHOP EAMES
Archbishop Eames telephoned on the afternoon of 30 November. We had a guarded conversation in preparation for his visit to Dublin to see the Taoiseach on 1 December.
This letter should have the usual restricted distribution.
Eames wanted to check one particular point. He had heard that some changes might have been made over the past day to the document (viz: the British draft Joint Declaration) which we had passed to him. I said that, to my knowledge, we had had no negotiations about the text since its delivery to Dublin last Friday. As he had probably heard (he had), the text had not been well received.
I filled Eames in on the absence of agreement, at the time of writing, on the holding of the Dublin Summit; and on the bilateral political environment. I said that rumours and misplaced conspiracy theories were putting the relationship under strain. It would be absurd if our serious dealings with the Irish Government were to be affected by over-reaction to wild stories in the media. One should remember Metternich's approach to the death of the Russian Ambassador at the Congress of Vienna. Above all, we should keep our eyes fixed firmly on the ball which really mattered. Anything which Eames could do in this direction would be most welcome to the Prime Minister.
I also told Eames that the Irish still seemed to find it hard to understand how essential it was to distance our process from Hume\Adams, if it was to be accepted by the Unionsits. He agreed that this was essential. I asked him to give the frankest possible view of feelings among the Unionists. There was a tendency on the part of the Irish Government to maintain that our reading of Unionist feelings was wrong, or that we were using presumed Unionist objections as an excuse to suit our own purposes. Eames indicated that he did not feel that the Irish understood the Unionists well.
Eames said that he would let us know how he got on tomorrow.
I am sending copies of this letter to John Sawers (FCO) and to Melanie Leech (Cabinet Office).
yours ever,
Roderic.
RODERIC LYNE
Jonathan Stephens Esq
Northern Ireland Office
10 DOWNING STREET LONDON SW1A 2AA
From the Private Secretary
30 November 1993
Dear Jonathan,
TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH ARCHBISHOP EAMES
Archbishop Eames telephoned on the afternoon of 30 November. We had a guarded conversation in preparation for his visit to Dublin to see the Taoiseach on 1 December.
This letter should have the usual restricted distribution.
Eames wanted to check one particular point. He had heard that some changes might have been made over the past day to the document (viz: the British draft Joint Declaration) which we had passed to him. I said that, to my knowledge, we had had no negotiations about the text since its delivery to Dublin last Friday. As he had probably heard (he had), the text had not been well received.
I filled Eames in on the absence of agreement, at the time of writing, on the holding of the Dublin Summit; and on the bilateral political environment. I said that rumours and misplaced conspiracy theories were putting the relationship under strain. It would be absurd if our serious dealings with the Irish Government were to be affected by over-reaction to wild stories in the media. One should remember Metternich's approach to the death of the Russian Ambassador at the Congress of Vienna. Above all, we should keep our eyes fixed firmly on the ball which really mattered. Anything which Eames could do in this direction would be most welcome to the Prime Minister.
I also told Eames that the Irish still seemed to find it hard to understand how essential it was to distance our process from Hume\Adams, if it was to be accepted by the Unionsits. He agreed that this was essential. I asked him to give the frankest possible view of feelings among the Unionists. There was a tendency on the part of the Irish Government to maintain that our reading of Unionist feelings was wrong, or that we were using presumed Unionist objections as an excuse to suit our own purposes. Eames indicated that he did not feel that the Irish understood the Unionists well.
Eames said that he would let us know how he got on tomorrow.
I am sending copies of this letter to John Sawers (FCO) and to Melanie Leech (Cabinet Office).
yours ever, Roderic.
RODERIC LYNE
Jonathan Stephens Esq Northern Ireland Office
27 1987 - 1990
38 1993
55 1990 - 1991
64 1993 - 1997
26 1993
57 1993
59 1993
51 1993
18 1993
24 1993 - 1994
41 1993 - 1994
32 1993 - 1994
72 1993 - 1994
8 1989 - 1990
76 1993 - 1994
1 1994
60 1993
65 1993
37 1993
54 1993
32 1993
77 1993
59 1993
49 1993
61 1991 - 1992
38 1991
48 1992 - 1993
134 1993 - ?-??
59 1993 - 1993
84 1993
64 1991
42
9
31 1996 - 1996
61 196 - 1996
49 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1997
32 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1996
74 1996 - None
4 1996 - 1996
8 1996 - 1996
30 1996 - 1996
7 1996 - 1996
24 1996 - 1996
9 1996 - 1996
59 1996 - 1996
60 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1997
41 1996 - 1996
45 1996 - 1996
67 1996 - 1996
16 1996 - 1996
1993-11-30
A letter recording a telephone conversation between Roderic Lyne and Robin Eames. Lyne briefed Eames on the British Government's line on the Joint Declaration and expressed his concerns regarding the Irish understanding of the need to distance the Declaration from Hume/Adams.
N/A
N/A
Unless otherwise specified, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitzed by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.