Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.
Collection associations (1)
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
SECRET AND PERSONAL
Copy - - of 11
From PUS
5 March 1990
Mr Burns [1]
cc SofS (L&B) [2&3]
Mr Ledlie [4]
Mr Deverell [5]
Mr Daniell [6]
Mr J McConnell [7]
Discussion with Father Reid
I gather there is to be a further meeting between Fr Reid and Mr McConnell tomorrow. Subject to any comments SofS himself may have, could I make one point on your minute of 1 March.
2. I very much agree with the thrust of your paragraph 3. But I paused over the detailed line advocated in paragraph 4, with its emphasis on the state of Adams' thinking. I wonder if that is right. It seems to me rather that Mr McConnell's line should be that whether or not Adams' thinking has changed, what matters to the British Government are the actions of Sinn Fein and the Provisional IRA. Until the former starts behaving truly like a constitutional party and the latter abandons its methods of securing what it wants, there really is no basis for dialogue between them and the Government. If Adams' own thinking has reached the conclusion, very well: but it is translating his thought into others' actions that counts.
3. It may be that the above is what you mean by "hard evidence". If so then we are at one, though I think it would be wise for Mr McConnell to indicate what is actually meant by those two words.
4. Let us have a quick word if the above gives you difficulty.
signed
JOHN BLELLOCH
5 March 1990
SECRET AND PERSONAL
Copy - - of 11
From PUS 5 March 1990
Mr Burns [1]
cc SofS (L&B) [2&3] Mr Ledlie [4] Mr Deverell [5] Mr Daniell [6] Mr J McConnell [7]
Discussion with Father Reid
I gather there is to be a further meeting between Fr Reid and Mr McConnell tomorrow. Subject to any comments SofS himself may have, could I make one point on your minute of 1 March. 2. I very much agree with the thrust of your paragraph 3. But I paused over the detailed line advocated in paragraph 4, with its emphasis on the state of Adams' thinking. I wonder if that is right. It seems to me rather that Mr McConnell's line should be that whether or not Adams' thinking has changed, what matters to the British Government are the actions of Sinn Fein and the Provisional IRA. Until the former starts behaving truly like a constitutional party and the latter abandons its methods of securing what it wants, there really is no basis for dialogue between them and the Government. If Adams' own thinking has reached the conclusion, very well: but it is translating his thought into others' actions that counts. 3. It may be that the above is what you mean by "hard evidence". If so then we are at one, though I think it would be wise for Mr McConnell to indicate what is actually meant by those two words. 4. Let us have a quick word if the above gives you difficulty.
signed
JOHN BLELLOCH 5 March 1990
27 1987 - 1990
38 1993
55 1990 - 1991
64 1993 - 1997
26 1993
57 1993
59 1993
51 1993
18 1993
24 1993 - 1994
41 1993 - 1994
32 1993 - 1994
72 1993 - 1994
8 1989 - 1990
76 1993 - 1994
1 1994
60 1993
65 1993
37 1993
54 1993
32 1993
77 1993
59 1993
49 1993
61 1991 - 1992
38 1991
48 1992 - 1993
134 1993 - ?-??
59 1993 - 1993
84 1993
64 1991
42
9
31 1996 - 1996
61 196 - 1996
49 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1997
32 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1996
74 1996 - None
4 1996 - 1996
8 1996 - 1996
30 1996 - 1996
7 1996 - 1996
24 1996 - 1996
9 1996 - 1996
59 1996 - 1996
60 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1997
41 1996 - 1996
45 1996 - 1996
67 1996 - 1996
16 1996 - 1996
1990-03-05
This document records John Blelloch's advice on how John McConnell should approach the next meeting with Father Alec Reid. Blelloch argued that McConnell should clarify that there could be no dialogue between Sinn Féin and the British Government until they had evidence that PIRA had stopped all paramilitary activity.
N/A
N/A
Unless otherwise specified, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitzed by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.