Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.
Collection associations (1)
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
27 February 1992
Dear William,
PRIME MINISTER'S MEETING WITH MR REYNOLDS: THE IRISH CONSTITUTION
Looking back through the records I have sent on last night's talks, I realise that I failed to record that the Prime Minister did say to Mr Reynolds that it was helpful to us that he had indicated that Articles 2 and 3 of the Irish Constitution could be on the negotiating table. In reply, Mr Reynolds said that he linked this with the Government of Ireland Act 1920. It was clear form the way he spoke that he was attracted by the Government of Ireland Act, not because he saw us repealing it as a quid pro quo for repeal of Articles 2 and 3 , but because it contained examples of all-Ireland co-operation which he clearly saw as relevant to present needs, and indeed a precursor of the kind of co-operation now taking place within the European Community.
As my earlier letter pointed out, the Prime Minister told Mr Reynolds that references of this kind to the 1920 Act were seen by Unionists as an attempt by the Irish to exercise some kind of condominium. Mr Reynolds denied that this was the case. The Unionist position was fully protected by Article 1 of the Anglo-Irish Agreement.
We have clearly not heard the last of this argument and the issue may warrant further analysis. Does the argument run in a wholly negative way from our point of view? Or are there things that we might want to do in co-operation with the Irish Government which we ourselves might want to justify in terms of the 1920 legislation?
I am copying this letter to Richard Gozney (Foreign and Commonwealth Office) and Sonia Phippard (Cabinet Office).
[Signed] (J. S. WALL)
[Addressed to] William Fittall, Esq., Northern Ireland Office
27 1988 - 2023
38 1993 - 1993
55 101 - 1991
64 1993 - 2020
26 1993 - 1993
57 1993 - 1993
59 1993 - 1993
51 1993 - 1993
18 1993 - 1993
24 1993 - 1994
41 1993 - 1994
32 1993 - 1994
72 101 - 1994
8 101 - 1990
76 101 - 1994
1 1994
60 101 - 1994
65 1993 - 2023
37 101 - 1993
54 101 - 1993
32 101 - 1993
77 1993 - 1993
58 101 - 2018
49 1993 - 1997
61 101 - 1992
38 101 - 1991
48 1992 - 1993
134 101 - ?-??
59 101 - 2023
84 101 - 1993
64 101 - 1991
44
11
31 1996 - 1996
61 1996 - 1996
49 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1997
32 1996 - 1996
48 1996 - 1996
74 1996 - None
4 1996 - 1996
33 1996 - 1996
30 1996 - 1996
7 1996 - 1996
24 1996 - 1996
9 1996 - 1996
59 1996 - 1996
60 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1997
41 1996 - 1996
45 1996 - 1996
67 1996 - 1996
16 1996 - 1996
87 1996 - None
23 1996 - 1996
79 1996 - None
22 1996 - 1996
1992-02-27
Stephen Wall's letter adds an addendum to the record of the John Major's meeting with Albert Reynolds that had been enclosed in Wall's letter to William Fittall from 26 February 1992. He writes that Major and Reynolds spoke at some length about placing Articles 2 and 3 of the Irish Constitution on the negotiating table.
N/A
N/A
Unless otherwise specified, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitzed by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.