Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.
Collection associations (2)
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
{10 (a-c)} SECRET
PRIME MINISTER
cc: PS/Foreign Secretary PS/Chancellor of the Exchequer
JOINT DECLARATION INITIATIVE: TEXT
You have seen the NIO letter commenting on the outstanding points after the 10 December round of negotiations with the Irish.
The NIO have reversed the position which they and the Cabinet Secretary took fiercely over the telephone concerning the "Forum for Peace and Reconciliation". They now grudgingly accept that there should be reference in the text, hedged with qualifications. It is largely our own fault that the Irish were able to counter attack over the Convention, as we let them know that Molyneaux was not strongly opposed to it.
If there is to be a "Forum" or Convention, I believe that we would be right to mention it in the text, with its lack of powers and status indicated as clearly as possible. To have the body surface from the Irish side within hours of the Joint eclaration would create enormous suspicion among Unionists that we had been party to a hidden Irish agenda – another act of "betrayal". I have consulted Archbishop Eames privately on the telephone, and he shares this view. We also know that James Molyneaux accepts the point.
The NIO's other main quibble is over the phrase "as of right". Here again, we have not helped ourselves. The phrase has been in the text for weeks, without objection from us. We have only picked it up at the eleventh hour.
With your agreement, I propose to negotiate in three parts:
1. _Clear the ground of minor points_. I shall deal first\, as instructed\, with points a. b. d. e. g. h. j. k.
2. _New Final Paragraph._ I shall then take paragraph 11\, which is a new Irish proposal this week\, plus one contested British sentence. I shall accept most of the Irish language (this involves few concessions – none of real substance) and negotiate hard for the best obtainable reference to the talks process. NIO's instructions do not help: we had "intensify" in the relevant paragraph of the 29 October Brussels statement\, but they do not want to repeat it. If the Irish do not concede an acceptable reference to the talks process, I shall reserve the point for you and the Taoiseach.
3. _Trade off of major points_. I shall negotiate on the basis that the old paragraphs 10 and 11 (the Irish Convention paragraphs in JD14) are already off the table and cannot be reintroduced. This remains a potential break point for us.
That leaves _four outstanding points_ which can reasonably be defined as the major obstacles.
I shall offer to trade: – "within three months" (paragraph 10)
– inclusion of the "Forum for Peace and Reconciliation" (end of paragraph 10), with acceptable qualifications;
– the Irish re-draft of the first sentence of paragraph 4 (which includes an aextra reference to a "united Ireland)
against:
– extensive revision of the "as of right" sentence (point (f) – fifth sentence of paragraph 4);
I may well not be able to complete this trade off. The Irish will fight hard to retain "as of right". In that case, I shall reserve the outstanding points to you and the Taoiseach.
_Conclusion_
This should leave us with no more than a handful of differences, if any, for you and the Taoiseach to discuss either here or by telephone. I doubt if they will include any genuine break points on either side, pretence apart.
{Roderic Lyne}
ROD LYNE _10 December 1993_
_text.jdi_
27 1988 - 2023
38 1993 - 1993
55 101 - 1991
64 1993 - 2020
26 1993 - 1993
57 1993 - 1993
59 1993 - 1993
51 1993 - 1993
18 1993 - 1993
24 1993 - 1994
41 1993 - 1994
32 1993 - 1994
72 101 - 1994
8 101 - 1990
76 101 - 1994
1 1994
60 101 - 1994
65 1993 - 2023
37 101 - 1993
54 101 - 1993
32 101 - 1993
77 1993 - 1993
58 101 - 2018
49 1993 - 1997
61 101 - 1992
38 101 - 1991
48 1992 - 1993
134 101 - ?-??
59 101 - 2023
84 101 - 1993
64 101 - 1991
44
11
31 1996 - 1996
61 1996 - 1996
49 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1997
32 1996 - 1996
48 1996 - 1996
74 1996 - None
4 1996 - 1996
33 1996 - 1996
30 1996 - 1996
7 1996 - 1996
24 1996 - 1996
9 1996 - 1996
59 1996 - 1996
60 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1997
41 1996 - 1996
45 1996 - 1996
67 1996 - 1996
16 1996 - 1996
87 1996 - None
23 1996 - 1996
79 1996 - None
22 1996 - 1996
1993-12-10
NIO conceding that the text should mention the Irish Convention in some way, though begrudgingly. Lyne then sets out the negotiating strategy at the upcoming Brussels summit, most of which involves trade-offs. He remains confident, however, that there remains only a handful of issues.
N/A
N/A
Unless otherwise specified, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
NoneThe National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitzed by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.