Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.
Collection associations (1)
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
PAB/6683/DGMcN/RG
FROM: D G McNEILL, PAB DATE: 23 NOVEMBER 1990
Copy No [ ] of 9
cc Mr Pilling [3] Mr Ledlie [4] Mr Alston [5] Mr Deverell [6] Mr Thomas [7] Mr Marsh [8] File [9]
PS/PUS (B&L) [1&2]
POLITICAL MOVEMENT AND THE PROVISIONALS
I met the two chaplains from Maze Prison on 22/11/90 at their request. They were seeking an update following the meeting which PUS and I had with Bishop Cahal Daly.
There have been no significant developments on their front since John Blelloch and I spoke to them. However, we had quite a long discussion during which I was able to probe them on the nature of their contacts and on their perceptions more fully than was possible before.
They confessed to me that they were both fed up by the lack of movement on our part - even though they understood the rationale - and that they were frightened by the enormity of the issue with which they see themselves grappling. They also were very uneasy at dealing with paramilitaries. However, they still believe they are on to a possible path to peace and will not let go unless someone takes the burden from them or closes the path down.
I started the discussion by telling them about the conversation with Bishop Daly. However when I said that we understood from the Bishop that PIRA was still considering some questions put to them about the meaning of meaningful etc the two chaplains said that that was not so. PIRA had given its answer to those questions before - "meaningful" meant "with sincerity; not quibbling over words" and if the violence were to cease it would not restart even if "meaningful dialogue" was not a success. This is what they had told John Blelloch and I earlier. They are not awaiting any further detailed response.
I restated Government's position, confirmed the enormity of the difficulties facing any Government which might contemplate dialogue while violence lasted and pointed to the "British Presence" speech as one of our answers to the sort of questions the priests were being asked.
However, I did probe a little further stressing that I was doing so merely to brief myself on the issue. I said that I found it difficult to believe that PIRA would give up the armed struggle just so that PIRA/Sinn Fein could engage in political dialogue when the result of that political dialogue would seem to me likely to be that they would be able to assert less influence over events. The priests thought that PIRA wanted to find a way out of the armed struggle because of the loss of life and other negative aspects of violence - if they gave up violence they may be able politically to win support from SDLP. However they could not abandon those members and supporters who had suffered and died over the last twenty years unless the organisation was able to say that it was in a dialogue which could lead to a political settlement. The priests still believe that the nature of that political settlement is not a condition for the ending of violence. I asked if the priests thought that PIRA was looking for a smokescreen. They thought that could be the case.
They repeated again that these contacts started with Sinn Fein and then changed to PIRA Army Council and though I did not learn any names I did find out that Martin McGuinness was [not] one of the contacts and that the Sinn Fein contacts were two people from different parts of Northern Ireland. The priests also detected some tension between the Army Council contacts and some of Sinn Fein's public pronouncements.
We talked about the proposition which had been put to the priests that violence could cease after the first meeting with Government at any level provided that "meaningful dialogue" would ensue. I explored this further again as someone who was briefing himself. I said for instance that what they seemed to be suggesting was that if a civil servant were to be authorised to talk or pass on the message to the contacts such as - Government can't talk to your organisation while violence goes on but, if violence were to cease (and this was added following the conversation about the concept of condemnation) without Government requiring a condemnation of previous violence, then Government at political level would be prepared to meet Sinn Fein representatives to discuss issues of concern to Sinn Fein, then violence would cease. I was suitably sceptical of this but they thought that this was something which could "turn the trick".
We concluded our discussion more or less there. However, in conclusion they said that they had not sought a meeting with their contacts since just before they spoke to John Blelloch and I because they had nothing to tell them but they were keen not to lose the contacts. They asked me if I thought it would be a good idea to put the suggestion in paragraph 7 to PIRA. I said absolutely not. I said we were still reflecting on the matter within the NIO and while we were doing so, firstly PIRA should not be allowed to think that we were considering an approach and secondly if there were such an approach it would be better if it were made fresh rather than floated as the priests' idea. They were very keen however to meet their contacts again. They confirmed when I asked that the contacts knew that the priests had talked to the NIO. I said then that if the priests were looking for an excuse to talk to the contacts again they could say that they had read the Secretary of State's "British Presence" speech and had gone to see the NIO for clarification of the messages; and that they had got that clarification. They could then ask their contacts what they thought of the speech and ask to clarify for themselves Sinn Fein's response. They agreed to keep in touch with me.
I have not at this stage copied this note to Ministers. PUS may wish to consider that. However it may be useful to discuss this conversation further. The priests will not go away unless we tell them that they are wasting their time or put a firm proposal to them. However we are getting very close to the time when we need to be firmer in our response to them one way or the other. They are sincere, dedicated and tenacious men whose integrity and sincerity are not in doubt although they are politically very naive.
(SIGNED)
D G McNEILL Political Affairs Division SH Ext 2238
27 1988 - 2023
38 1993 - 1993
55 101 - 1991
64 1993 - 2020
26 1993 - 1993
57 1993 - 1993
59 1993 - 1993
51 1993 - 1993
18 1993 - 1993
24 1993 - 1994
41 1993 - 1994
32 1993 - 1994
72 101 - 1994
8 101 - 1990
76 101 - 1994
1 1994
60 101 - 1994
65 1993 - 2023
37 101 - 1993
54 101 - 1993
32 101 - 1993
77 1993 - 1993
58 101 - 2018
49 1993 - 1997
61 101 - 1992
38 101 - 1991
48 1992 - 1993
134 101 - ?-??
59 101 - 2023
84 101 - 1993
64 101 - 1991
44
11
31 1996 - 1996
61 1996 - 1996
49 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1997
32 1996 - 1996
48 1996 - 1996
74 1996 - None
4 1996 - 1996
33 1996 - 1996
30 1996 - 1996
7 1996 - 1996
24 1996 - 1996
9 1996 - 1996
59 1996 - 1996
60 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1997
41 1996 - 1996
45 1996 - 1996
67 1996 - 1996
16 1996 - 1996
87 1996 - None
23 1996 - 1996
79 1996 - None
22 1996 - 1996
1990-11-23
This document provides a record of the meeting between Father Will Murphy, Father John Murphy and Danny McNeill on 22 November 1990 regarding their contacts with members of PIRA and McNeill's discussion with Bishop Cahal Daly.
N/A
N/A
Unless otherwise specified, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitzed by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.