Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.
Collection associations (0)
None
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
PAB/6762/DGMcN/RG
FROM: D G McNEILL, PAB
DATE: 4 JANUARY 1990
DESK IMMEDIATE
[Copy No 3 of [6]
PS/PUS (B&L) [3&4]
Mr Deverell [5]
File [6]
PS/Secretary of State (B&L) [1&2]
POLITICAL MOVEMENT AND THE PROVISIONALS: JOHN HUME
1. Since I spoke to the Secretary of State briefly on Friday 28 December 1990 I have had a further conversation with John Hume. He asked me to brief the Secretary of State on this conversation.
PIRA ceasefire and continuing violence
2. He has confirmed through intermediary contacts that the Christmas ceasefire was meant to be a significant signal from PIRA to the effect that the Republican movement was interested in seeking a way to end violence. He also said that he had indications that those in Sinn Fein with whom he had had direct contact earlier - Gerry Adams was the only one referred to by name - wanted to develop the idea of a longer term/permanent cessation and that they could deliver PIRA/Sinn Fein on this in appropriate circumstances. He said he wanted to reassure himself on this point before putting it forward as a firm assessment of his and he would try to do this very quickly - he later told me that he was to meet Gerry Adams today 4/1/91 and will contact me again over the weekend. He also informed me that in his view Martin McGuinness was at one with Adams.
3. His judgements - though this was before he had the "face to face" contacts - is that exploratory separate meetings between HMG and ROI Government (at civil service level) and the Republican movement would be enough to secure a scaling down (though those words were used loosely) of violence beforehand and for some time thereafter which could lead to a full scale cessation if those involved in the Republican movement were satisfied that both Governments were genuine in their willingness to consider alternative political structures and to involve Sinn Fein in those considerations - apart from the issue below no definitions was put on this. He explained that in his view if such contacts were ever to be made the Republican movement would not make them public.
ROI Government
4. He has kept Charles Haughey briefed on all these matters. He met him on 2/1/91. However so far as Hume knows only Haughey and one civil servant (whose name he told me on a personal basis) in the Republic of Ireland knows of his contacts though both know that he is keeping the Secretary of State briefed and the civil servant at least knows that he is in dialogue with me.
5. Hume said that this stage he was merely briefing Haughey and had not suggested that he take any action. However he did say that if the time came to consider taking some action Haughey would prefer to do it on a joint basis with HMG. This was not fully defined other than to say that it could be a joint declaration of some sort or HMG agreement to some action which would be taken by the Republic of Ireland - such as an all Ireland Peace Convention/Political Forum. As you know something like this has been suggested by Sinn Fein and according to Hume endorsed by the PAC. I asked Hume about the terms of the document which was drawn up by Sinn Fein and gave my opinion that it was worded in a strongly Republic way eg several references to the 1916 Proclamation. He said that this was PIRA/Sinn Fein wording and in his view if the concept were to run the wording could be sorted out.
6. He said that both he and Haughey were anxious not to do anything which would be perceived as sinking the talks initiative, mainly because of the respect which both of them had for the Secretary of State; but Hume made it clear that he was not keen that the initiative should reach a conclusion if that were to jeopardise the potential for success in achieving an end to violence. He said that if it was a choice between ending violence or the SDLP sitting down with Unionists in Northern Ireland his very clear view would be that an end to violence would be preferable. This may make him and perhaps the Republic of Ireland Government reluctant to agree to anything substantive on the talks front this month. His final point was that he was confident that Haughey would not take any action on the Provisionals front without consulting him though he was aware that Haughey would like to see the Prime Minister some time.
Conclusion
7. This note is for the Secretary of State's information. The circulation of the note is deliberately curtailed. I will report again after John Hume contacts me over the weekend.
(SIGNED)
D G McNEILL
Political Affairs Division
SH Ext 2238
PAB/6762/DGMcN/RG
FROM: D G McNEILL, PAB DATE: 4 JANUARY 1990
DESK IMMEDIATE
[Copy No 3 of [6] PS/PUS (B&L) [3&4] Mr Deverell [5] File [6]
PS/Secretary of State (B&L) [1&2]
POLITICAL MOVEMENT AND THE PROVISIONALS: JOHN HUME
PIRA ceasefire and continuing violence 2. He has confirmed through intermediary contacts that the Christmas ceasefire was meant to be a significant signal from PIRA to the effect that the Republican movement was interested in seeking a way to end violence. He also said that he had indications that those in Sinn Fein with whom he had had direct contact earlier - Gerry Adams was the only one referred to by name - wanted to develop the idea of a longer term/permanent cessation and that they could deliver PIRA/Sinn Fein on this in appropriate circumstances. He said he wanted to reassure himself on this point before putting it forward as a firm assessment of his and he would try to do this very quickly - he later told me that he was to meet Gerry Adams today 4/1/91 and will contact me again over the weekend. He also informed me that in his view Martin McGuinness was at one with Adams.
ROI Government 4. He has kept Charles Haughey briefed on all these matters. He met him on 2/1/91. However so far as Hume knows only Haughey and one civil servant (whose name he told me on a personal basis) in the Republic of Ireland knows of his contacts though both know that he is keeping the Secretary of State briefed and the civil servant at least knows that he is in dialogue with me.
Hume said that this stage he was merely briefing Haughey and had not suggested that he take any action. However he did say that if the time came to consider taking some action Haughey would prefer to do it on a joint basis with HMG. This was not fully defined other than to say that it could be a joint declaration of some sort or HMG agreement to some action which would be taken by the Republic of Ireland - such as an all Ireland Peace Convention/Political Forum. As you know something like this has been suggested by Sinn Fein and according to Hume endorsed by the PAC. I asked Hume about the terms of the document which was drawn up by Sinn Fein and gave my opinion that it was worded in a strongly Republic way eg several references to the 1916 Proclamation. He said that this was PIRA/Sinn Fein wording and in his view if the concept were to run the wording could be sorted out.
He said that both he and Haughey were anxious not to do anything which would be perceived as sinking the talks initiative, mainly because of the respect which both of them had for the Secretary of State; but Hume made it clear that he was not keen that the initiative should reach a conclusion if that were to jeopardise the potential for success in achieving an end to violence. He said that if it was a choice between ending violence or the SDLP sitting down with Unionists in Northern Ireland his very clear view would be that an end to violence would be preferable. This may make him and perhaps the Republic of Ireland Government reluctant to agree to anything substantive on the talks front this month. His final point was that he was confident that Haughey would not take any action on the Provisionals front without consulting him though he was aware that Haughey would like to see the Prime Minister some time.
Conclusion 7. This note is for the Secretary of State's information. The circulation of the note is deliberately curtailed. I will report again after John Hume contacts me over the weekend.
(SIGNED)
D G McNEILL Political Affairs Division SH Ext 2238
27 1987 - 1990
38 1993
55 1990 - 1991
64 1993 - 1997
26 1993
57 1993
59 1993
51 1993
18 1993
24 1993 - 1994
41 1993 - 1994
32 1993 - 1994
72 1993 - 1994
8 1989 - 1990
76 1993 - 1994
1 1994
60 1993
65 1993
37 1993
54 1993
32 1993
77 1993
59 1993
49 1993
61 1991 - 1992
38 1991
48 1992 - 1993
134 1993 - ?-??
59 1993 - 1993
84 1993
64 1991
42
9
31 1996 - 1996
61 196 - 1996
49 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1997
32 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1996
74 1996 - None
4 1996 - 1996
8 1996 - 1996
30 1996 - 1996
7 1996 - 1996
24 1996 - 1996
9 1996 - 1996
59 1996 - 1996
60 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1997
41 1996 - 1996
45 1996 - 1996
67 1996 - 1996
16 1996 - 1996
1991-01-04
This document provides an account of the meeting between Danny McNeill and John Hume on 4 January 1991 regarding Hume's talks with Sinn Féin, where Hume confirmed that the Christmas ceasefire of 1990 was a signal that PIRA was interested in pursuing the cessation of violence. Hume had also briefed Taoiseach Charles Haughey on the same, and Haughey was willing to consider acting with the British Government in the form of a joint declaration or convening an all-Ireland Forum with the British Government's agreement. The record shows that both Hume and Haughey preferred achieving an end to violence over the success of the talks initiative. The date is incorrectly noted as 1990, and should read 1991.
No Associations
N/A
N/A
Unless otherwise specified, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitzed by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.