Resource Collections

Image - Resources

Writing Peace: The National Archives of the UK (TNA)

Record of a Meeting between John Major, Michael Ancram and Jim Molyneaux on 9 December 1993 at 13.15

Thursday, 09 December 1993

i24329

Describes the meeting between John Major, Patrick Mayhew, Michael Ancram and James Molyneaux and their discussion on the draft 'Blueprint for Stability' as well as the text of the Joint Declaration. Addressed to Jonathan Stephens.

Download File (format is: "application/pdf")
Writing Peace: The National Archives of the UK (TNA)

(To go a specific resource item, please click on its link.)

Your Browser does not seem to allow embedded PDFs, but you can download the PDF instead.

None

Copyright

None

Physical Copy Information

None

Digital Copy Information

None

9 December 1993

From the Private Secretary

{Dear Jonathan},

**MEETING WITH MR JAMES MOLYNEAUX MP, 9 DECEMBER**

As agreed at the earlier Ministerial meeting, the Prime Minister, accompanied by your Secretary of State and by Mr Michael Ancram MP, met Mr James Molyneaux MP in Downing Street at 1315 on 9 December.

The Prime Minister thanked Mr Molyneaux for the draft "blueprint for stability", which he looked forward to reading carefully. It was very important that we should continue the talks process as a complementary exercise to the Joint Declaration initiative.

The Prime Minister reviewed the objectives of the Joint Declaration. There was a chance that it would help to achieve a cessation of violence, without compromising our principles or any points of fundamental importance. He accepted that the odds were probably against us. However, so long as the substance was acceptable, the Joint Declaration would have a number of attractions even without a cessation of violence. It would pre-empt the Provisionals from taking the initiative by stating their own terms for a cessation. It would put them on the defensive. If they turned it down they would be rejecting a very reasonable and widely supported position; and would be exposed as continuing the fight for extreme ends. The JD would register the support of the Irish Government for language which went much further than they had ever gone before. It would reinforce the right of the people of Northern Ireland to determine their own future, and would not concede any steps towards joint authority or any recognition of the "value" of a united Ireland. It would wind up the initiative rather than leave it open.

The Prime Minister said that the Government was awaiting the Taoiseach's definitive answer to the amendments we had proposed. If the Taoiseach accepted our points, the Government intended to go ahead with the Declaration.

The Prime Minister did not show a text to Mr Molyneaux, but summarised the key points. He then described the likely pattern of further action. His meeting in Brussels with the Taoiseach might open the way to a further meeting in London next week, at which the Joint Declaration would be published.

Mr Molyneaux interjected the odd comment and question, but otherwise said little. He expressed appreciation to the Prime Minister for keeping him in the picture. He seemed
relaxed, and did not express concern at anything which the Prime Minister had said.

I am sending copies of this letter to John Sawers (Foreign and Commonwealth Office) and Melanie Leech (Cabinet Office).

{yours ever,

Roderic}
RODERIC LYNE

J Stephens Esq
Northern Ireland Office