Resource Collections

Image - Resources

Writing Peace: The National Archives of the UK (TNA)

Record of Meeting between British Officials on 16 August 1989 on John McConnell's Discussion with Alec Reid

Friday, 18 August 1989

i22736

This memo, addressed to Jim Daniell, makes note of a meeting that took place on 16 August 1989 between Peter Brooke, John Blleloch, Mr Stephens, R O Miles, John Deverell, John McConnell and Jim Daniell regarding McConnell's discussions with Father Alec Reid. It outlines the meeting's conclusions, including the preparation of briefings for McConnell and guidance on how he should act in future meetings with Reid.

Download File (format is: "application/pdf")
Writing Peace: The National Archives of the UK (TNA)

(To go a specific resource item, please click on its link.)

Your Browser does not seem to allow embedded PDFs, but you can download the PDF instead.

None

Copyright

None

Physical Copy Information

None

Digital Copy Information

None

SECRET AND PERSONAL

FROM: PS/SECRETARY OF STATE
18 AUGUST 1989

Copy no 3 of 9
2 pages in total

PS/Secretary of State (L&B) [2&3]
PS/PUS (L&B) [4&5]
Mr Stephens - B [6]
Mr Miles - [7]
Mr Deverell - B [8]
Mr J McConnell - B [9]

Mr Daniell - B [1]

DISCUSSION WITH FATHER ALEC REID

On the evening of 16 August the Secretary of State discussed with officials (PUS, Mr Stephens, Mr Miles, Mr Deverell, Mr McConnell and you) Mr McConnell's minute of 14 August on this subject.

2. The conclusions of the meeting were as follows:
(i) If Father Reid approached Mr McConnell to ask for a further meeting (on a prisons matter or similar subject) Mr McConnell should agree to this.
(ii) At the meeting, Mr McConnell should deliver a carefully prepared message which would deploy established Government positions (eg, on the future of Northern Ireland as laid down in Article 1 of the Agreement) in such a way as to maximise the pressures on Sinn Fein to cease supporting the armed struggle.
(iii) A considered view should be reached on how Mr McConnell should react if Father Reid sought to pass a document to him during the meeting. The feeling of the meeting was that Mr McConnell should probably accept such a document, while giving no indication whatever that a reply would be forthcoming.
(iv) During the meeting Mr McConnell should not make any enquiry about Father Reid's position. If he volunteered information on this point, then the meeting should be terminated.
(v) In a longer timescale, some preliminary work should be put in hand to assess the implications for Government or possible components in any ceasefire package which might be put forward. Prisons issues might clearly figure largely in any such package.
(vi) Finally, also in the longer term, the Secretary of State asked that consideration should be given to ways in which pressure on the Republican movement to take a constructive route could be maximised - both through effective security measures which would continue to erode terrorist capabilities, and social and other policies (eg in the prisons) which might contribute to detaching people from the Republican cause.

3. The Secretary of State wishes to see the "steering brief" which is being prepared for Mr McConnell (ie the material envisaged at (ii) and (iii) above) before it is used. (I understand that you are coordinating the preparation of this material.) Although on leave, the Secretary of State will come into NIO(L) next week for this purpose. I should therefore be grateful if the material could reach the Private Office in London by 5.00pm on Wednesday 23 August.

(signed:)

G J LEACH
PRIVATE SECRETARY
18 AUGUST 1989