We use cookies to track usage and preferences.I understandPrivacy Policy
Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
This collection was scanned and the metadata was recorded by Ruth Murray, Isha Pareek, Annabel Harris and Eleanor Williams.
Collection associations (0)
None
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
16/09 '96 FRI 11:37 FAX SECURE-FX TRANSMISSION SCND SEC AI 001
{916/1}
PST; PSS; Ministers Owen, de Rossa & Taylor; Attorney General; Minister of State Coveney; Messrs. Teahon, Donlon & Dalton; Ambs. London and Washington; Joint Secretary; Counsellors A-I.
6 September 1996 NO. OF PAGES: 2
TO: HQ FOR: Second Secretary O hUiginn FROM: Belfast FROM: K. Dowling
_Subj: Minister Ancram's meeting yesterday with DUP_
1. Chris Maccabe advised John Fisher here this morning that Minister Ancram instructed that we be informed of the outcome of discussions be had with the DUP at around 5.30 pm yesterday.
2. Paisley was accompanied by Ian Paisley Junior and OUP Omagh District Councillor member of their talks team) Oliver Gibson. Ancram was accompanied by Chris Maccabe\, Richard Lemon\, Alan Whysall and Lavery (Central Secretariat).
3. The background was that Ancram had arranged for the DUP to stay on\, after a meeting on education yesterday afternoon\, to discuss talks. Paisley had refused to do so\, feeling that he had been "snubbed" by the Secretary of State (something he went public about this morning on the radio). Ancram had\, however\, been able to persuade him to stay to discuss the talks\, but only on the basis that their discussions did not constitute a "meeting". Accordingly\, there is no formal note of the discussions on the British side.
4. The British had known beforehand that Paisley and his colleagues would make great play on the Loyalist issue and would wish to see the PUP and the UDP excluded from the talks. The British sec the reasons for this as a combination of ''old enmities" and the realisation that if the PUP and UDP were to be excluded\, and assuming continuation of the DUP's alliance with the UKUP party\, the DUP\, under the consensus rules\, would effectively have a veto over the proceedings.
5. The discussions were completely devoted to the subject of the Loyalists. Paisley said that the DUP would make "representations" against them at the resumed talks on Monday. He himself\, however\, will not be there as he is in Canada. They were nor\, however\, demandina a debate. They accepted that the "representations" must be considered by the book.
6. They suggested\, however\, that the talks should be immediately adjourned once the representations were made. Otherwise\, the DUP would "probably" withdraw from the talks permanently.
7. They also suggested that\, if the Loyalists were allowed to stay\, others also (members of the UUP\, it must be presumed) would feel obliged to leave. There was very strong feeling on the matter within Northern Ireland\, and it could have the effect that the talks process could not survive.
8. Ancram declined to say whether the Governments would be amenable to an adjournment. The procedures would have to be carried out with great care as precedents would be set. Paisley had retaliated by saying that there were suspicions of "kite flying" by the Governments\, against the day when Sinn Fein were in the talks.
9. Ancram recalled that there were still representations outstanding against a number of parties (those made by the SDLP against the UUP and Trimble after Drumcree\, it must be presumed). I understand that\, in this regard\, Paisley implored him to have {?} the DUP thrown out over Drumcree with\, apparently\, Paisley Junior adding th.at it should be as near to an election as possible.
10. The British side told me with great reluctance (because of sensitivity as to how we might take it)\, that at one point Paisley had observed that if the Irish Government followed a certain course of conduct (it is not clear what precisely he had meant - there was a lot of nodding and innuendo on the DUP's part in the discussions)\, it would have its innards kicked out. Again according to the British\, he seemed unconcerned whether this amounted to dishonouring the principles.
11. Ancram also raised briefly the question of the agenda. It seemed that Paisley would be content with a reference to "constitutional issues"\, as long\, of course\, as he was not obliged to discuss the constitutional status of Northern Ireland.
12. The British understand that the DUP have organised a Press Conference for 9am on Monday in Castle Buildings (presumably to announce their intention to seek an adjournment of the plenary until there is a decision by the two Governments on the exclusion of the PUP/UDP). There is a worry that they may even go public on the matter today.
3
72 1996 - 1997
23 1996 - 1996
3
52 1992 - 1996
48 1996 - 1996
2
75 1996 - 1996
11 1996 - 1996
3
91 1996 - 1996
34 1996 - 1996
11 1996 - 1996
2
11 1996 - 1996
28 1996 - 1996
This document provides an account of a meeting between Michael Ancram and the DUP delegation that took place on 5 September 1996. The author notes that the discussion was completely dedicated to the subject of loyalists, with the DUP delegation declaring that they were going to make representations against them on the coming Monday. They stated that they would expect that the talks be adjourned after they make the representation, and threatened to withdraw from the talks in case that did not happen. They discussed other outstanding representations as well as the agenda.
No Associations
N/A
The National Archives of Ireland have kindly granted the Quill Project interim permission to publish our research scans, despite not meeting their usual reproduction standards. This agreement does not cover any re-publication or manipulation of these images. Any enquiries about reproductions should be directed to the National Archives of Ireland.
This document was created by Irish Government civil servants in the course of their duties and therefore falls under Irish Government Copyright. The Irish Government is committed to the European Communities (Re-Use of Public Sector Information) Regulations.NAI, 2021/106/16, accessed via the Quill Project at https://www.quillproject.net/resource_collections/353/resource_item/29614.