This project models the series of formal and informal negotiations which led to the publication, in December 1993, of a declaration issued jointly by the British and Irish Governments. The Joint Declaration was a critical policy document which paved the way for a ceasefire and the entry of Sinn Féin into formal talks. It also laid out a shared set of principles – including, crucially, self-determination for the people of Ireland subject to the consent of the people of Northern Ireland – which would come to underpin the Belfast Good Friday Agreement and provide a framework for its ratification.
This committee has been created to model internal British Government documents and meetings.
To see the full record of a committee, click on the corresponding committee on the map below.
[Exact time unknown] John Chilcot and Patrick Mayhew discussed the Joint Declaration and amended David Cooke's proposed wording for an amendment to paragraph 4. The minute to John Major recommending next steps was sent, with a final version of the British proposed amendment to paragraph 4 of JD12.
Membership (at session start):
Michael Ancram, Kenneth Baker, Tony Beeton, David Blatherwick, John Blelloch, Ian Burns, Robin Butler, John Chilcot, David Cooke, Jim Daniell, Timothy Daunt, John Deverell, William Fittall, David Gillmore, Christopher Glyn-Jones, Richard Gozney, Douglas Hurd, Roderic Lyne, John Major, Jonathan Margetts, Peter May, Patrick Mayhew, John McConnell, David McIlroy , Danny McNeill, R. O. Miles, Anthony Pawson, Christopher Prentice , Stephen Rickard, A W Stephens, Jonathan Stephens, Quentin Thomas, Stephen Wall (33 total)
Representing 1 delegations:
No imported or exported documents
Resources (6):
Resource Collections (0):
None
Resource Items (6):
This document summarizes how things stand with regards to the Joint Declaration initiative, including the position of the Irish Government, John Hume and PIRA and the likely reception both in Britain and Ireland to the Joint Declaration. Mayhew also outlined the discussion between the British and Irish delegations regarding the constitutional guarantee, and emphasized the importance of securing a reference to it in explicit terms. The issue of securing Jim Molyneaux's support for the Joint Declaration initiative is also set out, along with an illustrative sequence of events.
This document contains the text of paragraph 4 of the Joint Declaration with amendments (underlined) regarding the constitutional guarantee that Northern Ireland would not leave the United Kingdom without the consent of the majority of the people of Northern Ireland. The document includes some annotations.
This document sets out the possible outcomes and next steps of talks depending on the reaction to the current draft JD12.
This minute, circulated by Tony Beeton on behalf of Patrick Mayhew on 12 October 1993, provides an overview of the recent developments regarding the Joint Declaration. Mayhew confirmed that Taoiseach Albert Reynolds had agreed to offer four assurance based around the nature of their talks and ruling out any expectations for the British to talk to Sinn Féin. He also emphasized the importance of making a reference to the constitutional guarantee and getting Jim Molyneaux's understanding on the matter. The letter encloses four annexes - a proposal for a way forward; an intelligence assessment; the latest version of the Joint Declaration; and an amendment to paragraph 4 of it. Only Annex A and D are present in this collection.
This cover letter, send by Tony Beeton to Peter May, encloses an expanded version of a previous document recording an illustrative sequence of events for the Joint Declaration initiative.
This document, written by Jonathan Stephens, contains the record of a meeting between Patrick Mayhew and John Chilcot on 12 October 1993. It records that Mayhew agreed that there should be an explicit reference to a constitutional guarantee in paragraph 4 of the Joint Declaration, and decided that he would approach James Molyneaux after getting Prime Minister John Major's agreement to the textual amendments he had proposed.
Summary of events in this session:
Individuals:
0 0 0 0
List of people joining the committee
List of people leaving the committee
List of people elected to a position
Documents:
0 0 0
List of proposals created
List of proposals amended
List of proposals copied
List of proposals imported
List of proposals to be voted on
List of proposals debated
Decisions:
List of proposals adopted
List of proposals rejected
List of proposals dropped
List of proposals referred
List of postpone debate voted on
List of other proposals voted on
Procedure:
List of procedural motion
List of motions debated
Icon key
Person joining a committee
Person leaving a committee
Person elected to a position
A new document introduced
An amendment proposed
A document introduced from another committee
A revision of another document begun
Amendment imported from another committee
Proposal Debated
Drop a proposal
Refer a proposal
Adopt a proposal
Other vote (continue debate)
Reject a proposal
Postpone debate on a proposal
Procedural motion introduced
Procedural Motion Debated
Procedural motion with sub-decisions