This project models the series of formal and informal negotiations which led to the publication, in December 1993, of a declaration issued jointly by the British and Irish Governments. The Joint Declaration was a critical policy document which paved the way for a ceasefire and the entry of Sinn Féin into formal talks. It also laid out a shared set of principles – including, crucially, self-determination for the people of Ireland subject to the consent of the people of Northern Ireland – which would come to underpin the Belfast Good Friday Agreement and provide a framework for its ratification.
This committee has been created to model internal British Government documents and meetings.
To see the full record of a committee, click on the corresponding committee on the map below.
[Exact time unknown] Quentin Thomas reported JD13, and prepared a paper analysing its contents.
Membership (at session start):
Michael Ancram, Kenneth Baker, Tony Beeton, David Blatherwick, John Blelloch, Ian Burns, Robin Butler, John Chilcot, Ken Clarke, David Cooke, Jim Daniell, Timothy Daunt, John Deverell, David Fell, William Fittall, David Gillmore, Christopher Glyn-Jones, Richard Gozney, Michael Howard, Douglas Hurd, Roderic Lyne, John Major, Jonathan Margetts, Peter May, Patrick Mayhew, John McConnell, David McIlroy , Danny McNeill, R. O. Miles, Anthony Pawson, Christopher Prentice , Stephen Rickard, Malcolm Rifkind , A W Stephens, Jonathan Stephens, Quentin Thomas, Stephen Wall (37 total)
Representing 1 delegations:
Imported Documents
Imported Amendments
Exported Documents
Exported Amendments
Resources (5):
Resource Collections (0):
None
Resource Items (5):
Thomas gives analysis of new Irish draft of JD. Shows attempt to disentangle JDI from Hume. Shows sensitivity to Unionist fears/willingness to amend Irish Constit. since elements are resented by Unionists. This is less one-sided than pre. drafts. Shows effort of Irish gov. to encourage Provisionals to abandon armed struggle. Unionists will likely not be interested by the language of the doc. which is designed to accomodate them in a united Ireland.
Comparison of the changes between the previous draft (JD11) and this new Irish draft of the Joint Declaration (JD13). No omissions are noted from the previous document and all additions indicate an effort to bring Unionists onside. It still omits the constitutional guarantee and does not recognise NI as part of the United Kingdom, tempering the effect of these efforts. Questions are posed about the suitability of the text for the Provisionals, the British Government, constitutional Unionists, and Loyalists and also about whether the Irish government is fully committed to it.
JD13 with Thomas' underlines and sidelines of passages added since the last Irish text (JD11).
Letter sent by Quentin Thomas to Robin Butler with comments on the Irish perception of the prospects of its new draft of the Joint Declaration (JD13) ahead of the the Butler/Nally group meeting the following day. JD13 was conveyed to Quentin Thomas by Seán Ó hUiginn on 9th November 1993 (the evening before). It is also copied to Roderic Lyne, John Sawers, and Jonathan Stephens
Summary of events in this session:
Individuals:
0 0 0 0
List of people joining the committee
List of people leaving the committee
List of people elected to a position
Documents:
0 0 0
List of proposals created
List of proposals amended
List of proposals copied
List of proposals imported
List of proposals to be voted on
List of proposals debated
Decisions:
List of proposals adopted
List of proposals rejected
List of proposals dropped
List of proposals referred
List of postpone debate voted on
List of other proposals voted on
Procedure:
List of procedural motion
List of motions debated
Icon key
Person joining a committee
Person leaving a committee
Person elected to a position
A new document introduced
An amendment proposed
A document introduced from another committee
A revision of another document begun
Amendment imported from another committee
Proposal Debated
Drop a proposal
Refer a proposal
Adopt a proposal
Other vote (continue debate)
Reject a proposal
Postpone debate on a proposal
Procedural motion introduced
Procedural Motion Debated
Procedural motion with sub-decisions