This project models the series of formal and informal negotiations which led to the publication, in December 1993, of a declaration issued jointly by the British and Irish Governments. The Joint Declaration was a critical policy document which paved the way for a ceasefire and the entry of Sinn Féin into formal talks. It also laid out a shared set of principles – including, crucially, self-determination for the people of Ireland subject to the consent of the people of Northern Ireland – which would come to underpin the Belfast Good Friday Agreement and provide a framework for its ratification.
This committee has been created to model internal British Government documents and meetings.
To see the full record of a committee, click on the corresponding committee on the map below.
[Exact time unknown] Jonathan Stephens sent a letter to Roderic Lyne including an assessment of the present position and next steps on the Joint Declaration Initiative. Attached at Annex B was an updated version of the Alternative British Draft of the Joint Declaration (12 November Draft).
Membership (at session start):
Michael Ancram, Kenneth Baker, Tony Beeton, David Blatherwick, John Blelloch, Ian Burns, Robin Butler, John Chilcot, Ken Clarke, David Cooke, Jim Daniell, Timothy Daunt, John Deverell, David Fell, William Fittall, David Gillmore, Christopher Glyn-Jones, Richard Gozney, Michael Howard, Douglas Hurd, Roderic Lyne, John Major, Jonathan Margetts, Peter May, Patrick Mayhew, John McConnell, David McIlroy , Danny McNeill, R. O. Miles, Anthony Pawson, Christopher Prentice , Stephen Rickard, Malcolm Rifkind , A W Stephens, Jonathan Stephens, Quentin Thomas, Stephen Wall (37 total)
Representing 1 delegations:
Imported Documents
Imported Amendments
Exported Documents
Exported Amendments
Resources (17):
Resource Collections (0):
None
Resource Items (17):
An illustrative draft statement that includes the language of JD13 with the British addition of a constitutional guarantee.
A British draft of the Joint Declaration which includes a specific reference to the constitutional guarantee, unlike the Dublin JD13. This aims to bridge the perceived gap with unionist opinion. The rest of the language is taken from JD13. One page in the middle is repeated (6 and 7 of 10 are duplicates)
Draft 13 of the Joint Declaration. Includes underlining and marginal annotations.
An updated copy of the alternative British draft of the Joint Declaration, submitted by Tony Beeton for approval by Jonathan Stephens.
Letter covers the main contextual points of the Hume/Adams talks, the state of JD13 in light of Archbishop Eames's conversations with Unionists. It proposes that a text be agreed that satisfies the Irish (and potentially the PIRA through them) and Jim Molyneaux. The possibility of tabling a British draft of the Joint Declaration was also discussed.
Draft passage with annotations that reaffirms the British commitment to peace and makes strong statement that a political path is open to Sinn Fein should they renounce violence.
John Major's principal concern is to maintain the united front with the Irish government decided upon at Brussels in October. He explains the difficulties that Hume/Adams poses to the JDI and reminds Reynolds that the Brussels agreement was to end violence and find a new basis for talks (with one not being conditional on the other). He also reminds Reynolds of his principal concern: not taking a line which potentially increases violence (i.e. one that is unnacceptable to the majority unionist community). He notes that the Irish side are holding up the parallel talks process, contravening the spirit of the Brussels agreement (as Major understands it).
The letter has been significantly revised in light of the letter received from Reynolds in the intervening time, and the various negative reports of his attitude towards the British Government in light of their approach to the Joint Declaration.
Letter from Northern Ireland Office to Jonathan Stephens at 10 Downing Street enclosing an assessment of the Joint Declaration Initiative and possible future options.
Annex B to an unknown document. Handwritten annotation indicating 'Possible British [Test]' 'As sent to No. 10 12.11.93' A separate statement on Constitutional Issues.
Major seeks to repair relationship and affirm their shared goal.
Although both Annex A and B are mentioned as enclosures in the fax, only Annex B is included in the documents. Focus was on the Hume/Adams talks and their impact on British policy towards the Joint Declaration Initiative. This reflects Britain's consistent concern about unionist reaction to a document that is too reminiscent of the Hume/Adams initiative. There is particular concern over the absence of explicit reference to the constitutional guarantee in JD13, which the enclosed British draft includes.
Gives an assessment of the present position on the JDI relating to the following: Hume/Adams, JDI, testing out JD13, a British draft Joint Declaration. Encloses an illustrative draft statement that includes the language of JD13 with the British addition of a constitutional guarantee.
Additional points proposed by Douglas Hurd to be included in John Major's Speech at the Lord Mayor's Banquet on 15th November. Particular emphasis on tying together political talks and the cessation of violence (in contradiction to the Irish position).
Encloses draft response from PM to Taoiseach.
Letter enclosing a draft reply to Albert Reynolds and a revised passage of the Prime Minister's upcoming Guildhall speech, both for comment from the Northern Ireland office
Reports that there is evidence to corroborate a NI MP's claim that the British government have held secret talks with senior republicans, despite their outright denials of these meetings. It is alleged that these talks were cleared at the highest level. The British stuck to their line that they do not and have never spoken to those who use violence for political purposes.
Summary of events in this session:
Individuals:
0 0 0 0
List of people joining the committee
List of people leaving the committee
List of people elected to a position
Documents:
0 0 0
List of proposals created
List of proposals amended
List of proposals copied
List of proposals imported
List of proposals to be voted on
List of proposals debated
Decisions:
List of proposals adopted
List of proposals rejected
List of proposals dropped
List of proposals referred
List of postpone debate voted on
List of other proposals voted on
Procedure:
List of procedural motion
List of motions debated
Icon key
Person joining a committee
Person leaving a committee
Person elected to a position
A new document introduced
An amendment proposed
A document introduced from another committee
A revision of another document begun
Amendment imported from another committee
Proposal Debated
Drop a proposal
Refer a proposal
Adopt a proposal
Other vote (continue debate)
Reject a proposal
Postpone debate on a proposal
Procedural motion introduced
Procedural Motion Debated
Procedural motion with sub-decisions