This project models the series of formal and informal negotiations which led to the publication, in December 1993, of a declaration issued jointly by the British and Irish Governments. The Joint Declaration was a critical policy document which paved the way for a ceasefire and the entry of Sinn Féin into formal talks. It also laid out a shared set of principles – including, crucially, self-determination for the people of Ireland subject to the consent of the people of Northern Ireland – which would come to underpin the Belfast Good Friday Agreement and provide a framework for its ratification.
This committee has been created to model internal British Government documents and meetings.
To see the full record of a committee, click on the corresponding committee on the map below.
The Prime Minister held a ministerial meeting to discuss the Joint Declaration initiative. Various items of work were commissioned.
Membership (at session start):
Michael Ancram, Kenneth Baker, Tony Beeton, David Blatherwick, John Blelloch, Ian Burns, Robin Butler, John Chilcot, Ken Clarke, David Cooke, Jim Daniell, Timothy Daunt, John Deverell, David Fell, William Fittall, David Gillmore, Christopher Glyn-Jones, Richard Gozney, Michael Howard, Douglas Hurd, Roderic Lyne, John Major, Jonathan Margetts, Peter May, Patrick Mayhew, John McConnell, David McIlroy , Danny McNeill, R. O. Miles, Anthony Pawson, Christopher Prentice , Stephen Rickard, Malcolm Rifkind , A W Stephens, Jonathan Stephens, Quentin Thomas, Stephen Wall (37 total)
Representing 1 delegations:
Imported Documents
Imported Amendments
Exported Documents
Exported Amendments
Resources (15):
Resource Collections (0):
None
Resource Items (15):
Relevant ministers and civil servants were present, including Michael Ancram who reported on his conversation with Jim Molyneaux on the 8 December 1993. Molyneaux had given him a draft document called "Blueprint for Stability". Then the meeting turned to the agreed draft text JD15, where they considered it sentence for sentence. The letter goes on to list the main points deriving from this. Mayhew also said that he thought that PIRA were on the verge of a cessation of violence.
Outlines the developments that have taken place in the Joint Declaration Initiative since the Ministerial Group meeting and provides an assessment of the consequences of releasing the statement. Encloses the text of the JD 15 with the amendments underlines and also a handling plan for the events just before and following the release of the Joint Declaration. Lightly annotated.
A draft speaking note for Patrick Mayhew's use at a ministerial meeting, which advocates proceeding with JD15. Enclosed with a covering letter from Quentin Thomas.
Provides a timetable for the release of the declaration and outlines some measures to undertake before and immediately after it. Lightly annotated.
Text of the Joint Declaration with proposed amendments and annotated comments on the margins.
Text of JD15 with proposed amendments by British and Irish Governments underlined. Also contains a list of possible amendments on the last page.
Contains the text of the Joint Declaration with amendments proposed by the British Government, the Irish Government and James Molyneaux clearly marked. Annotated. Page 7 contains revised version of paragraphs 10 and 11, as proposed by the Irish Government.
Contains the text of the Joint Declaration with amendments proposed by the British Government, the Irish Government and James Molyneaux clearly marked. Annotated. Page 5 and 6 identical. Page 8 contains revised version of paragraphs 10 and 11, as proposed by the Irish Government.
He attaches a working draft of JD15 with amendments agreed by ministers in a morning meeting, plus two coming from Jim Molyneaux. In this meeting, Mansergh gave him some further comments marked E in the text. They discussed his slight concerns over paragraph 4 and the Irish amendments to the text. Before finally dealing with the question of an Irish Convention, the practicalities of when to launch the Joint Declaration, and a meeing between the Irish and John Hume.
Lists questions for the British Government to consider in advance of the release of the Joint Declaration.
Lyne asked Rifkind's office for comments on some papers circulated on the 7 December regarding the Joint Declaration ready for the meeting. He is broadly happy with the text, but not enthusiastic as he has some concerns about tone and language. But, he will support it.
Conveys Defense Secretary Malcolm Rifkind's views on the text of the Joint Declaration for John Major's reference.
A note from Roderic Lyne summarising the Defence Secretary's views on the Joint Declaration initative ('broadly content, but not enthusistic') in advance of a meeting on 9 December 1993 which he could not attend.
Comments on the discussions around the Joint Declaration and outlines some goals in advance of the release of the statement. Encloses a report by Robin Butler on the Joint Declaration which is not available as an attachment to this file, but is recorded elsewhere in the folder. Annotated.
Provides account of meeting between John Major, Patrick Mayhew, Douglas Hurd, Kenneth Clarke, Michael Howard; Michael Ancram, Robin Butler, John Chilcot; Quentin Thomas and Jonathan Stephens. Records discussion on proposed amendments in the draft of the Joint Declaration.
Summary of events in this session:
Individuals:
0 0 0 0
List of people joining the committee
List of people leaving the committee
List of people elected to a position
Documents:
0 0 0
List of proposals created
List of proposals amended
List of proposals copied
List of proposals imported
List of proposals to be voted on
List of proposals debated
Decisions:
List of proposals adopted
List of proposals rejected
List of proposals dropped
List of proposals referred
List of postpone debate voted on
List of other proposals voted on
Procedure:
List of procedural motion
List of motions debated
Icon key
Person joining a committee
Person leaving a committee
Person elected to a position
A new document introduced
An amendment proposed
A document introduced from another committee
A revision of another document begun
Amendment imported from another committee
Proposal Debated
Drop a proposal
Refer a proposal
Adopt a proposal
Other vote (continue debate)
Reject a proposal
Postpone debate on a proposal
Procedural motion introduced
Procedural Motion Debated
Procedural motion with sub-decisions