The Wyoming Constitution Convention began September 2, 1889 without the authorization from an enabling act. The articles were individually voted on, creating the final Constitution of Wyoming on September 30, 1889. It was later ratified on November 5, 1889.
People: 67,
Procedures: 860,
Documents: 373,
Decisions: 1988
View more »
The Constitution of Wyoming was written in September 1889. Over just 25 working days, and without the authorization of an enabling act by the U.S. Congress, 49 of the 55 delegates elected to the Convention met in Cheyenne to draft the state’s foundational text.
Like other contemporary state constitutional conventions, such as North Dakota (1889), and Arizona (1910), Wyoming followed an open proposition approach to constitution-writing. Individual delegates presented files on specific subjects, which were numbered and referred to one—or occasionally multiple—of the standing committees established to consider propositions relevant to their area of expertise. The committees prepared reports on these propositions in which they recommended indefinite postponement, adoption, amendment, or a substitute proposition on the same subject. The reports were then referred to the Convention to be taken up in the Committee of the Whole. The Committee of the Whole considered the standing committee reports, and drafted its own reports either recommending the adoption of the standing committee’s recommendations, or offering its own on the file or files under consideration. The Convention then voted to adopt or reject the Committee of the Whole’s report. When a report which recommended the passage of a particular file was adopted, the file in question was referred to the Committee on Revision and Adjustment, whose duty it was to order the propositions into a draft constitution, whilst ensuring that no one part of the Constitution conflicted with any other. The draft constitution was sent back to the Convention, where it was amended and voted upon article-by-article. Successful articles were ultimately enrolled as the Constitution of Wyoming, approved by the Convention on September 30, and ratified on November 5, 1889.
To construct the Quill timeline, the editors consulted a number of sources, most notably the Journal and Debates of the Constitutional Convention of the State of Wyoming, in addition to copies of the propositions deposited in the Wyoming State Archives, and contemporary newspapers. In many cases, these newspapers describe events that were not accounted for in the Journal or the Debates. Where relevant, multiple sources have been used to corroborate the events in a timeline. A full list of source materials can be found on the “Full Record” view.
Users may be interested in how pieces of proposed constitutional text circulated throughout the Convention. This procedure is captured in a document event’s “Related Events” tab. A more general overview of documents’ journeys throughout the Convention is provided by the “Calendar View”. The “Document Library” view provides a zoomed out look at all documents that were introduced in the Convention and will be compelling to those users who are approaching the project with an interest in particular documents.
Elizabeth Green
Documentary Editor
Quill Project
Pembroke College, Oxford.
July 2023.
This page shows the complete source-material for this negotiation.
Users with the appropriate permission can use this screen to make changes to the convention records from here.
This page gives access to the main visualizations used to explore the work of committees or individuals.
It is the best place to start if you have specific research questions to investigate.
This view shows a timeline of the events with an indication the
flow of documents between committees.
This will help make sense of the relationship between committees. The page also shows how busy committees were at different times.
This view shows a summary of the topic keywords associated with events during this negotiation, and
allows users to find events associated with each keyword.
This page offers a series of views for exploring the work of those involved in this process of negotiation, focusing on the hierarchical
relationship of proposals rather than on the sequence of events. Other tools presented here show the volume of work handled by each committee, or the number of events that each
individual played a leading roll in.
Cite as: Hector Manzanerez, Joseph Andersen-Stanley, Yana Anderson-Stanley, Ethan Bassett, Tori Crane, Cashlyn English, Daniel Little, Ashlynn Poleman, Hannah Thayne, Chris Vizcardo, Nicholas Cole, Lauren Davis, Wyoming State Constitutional Convention 1889, Quill Project at Pembroke College (Oxford, 2020-2023).